Examiner Mary C Jacob

What the data says.

Mary C Jacob's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across one art unit. Over 277 disposed applications, she allowed 200 and abandoned 77, for an allowance rate of 72%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record within the assigned art unit and describes her historical disposition pattern without indicating outcomes for any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's dispositions across all assigned art units into a single allowance rate. This aggregate describes what occurred in past applications and reflects historical patterns of allowance and abandonment. The figure is not a prediction about any particular case. Because the record pools different art units, individual application outcomes may vary by subject matter and facts.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Mary C Jacob

• 01What is Mary C Jacob's overall allowance rate?

  72%, based on 200 allowed and 77 abandoned applications out of 277 decided cases.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  One art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03Does this allowance rate apply to my application?

  No. The pooled rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual results depend on application facts, claims, and prior art.
• 04What does 'disposed applications' mean?

  Disposed applications are those that have been decided—either allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.