Examiner Marzia T Monty has allowed 132 of 184 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Marzia T Monty maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 184 disposed applications, 132 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 72%. The allowance rate ranges from 66% to 77% across these art units. This pooled figure represents the examiner's decided applications across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions, not predictions about any specific application.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units and presents an overall allowance rate as a historical summary. The 72% figure describes past dispositions across all art units combined and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Range variation across art units reflects differences in subject matter and application complexity within TC 2100. Pooled data provides context for the examiner's record but does not forecast results in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 38 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Marzia T Monty has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 205 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP