LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MASUD K KHAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Masud K Khan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 494 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Masud K Khan has allowed 438 of 494 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

89% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2132 · 94%AU 2131 · 77%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Masud K Khan maintains a public record across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning 2 art units. Of 494 disposed applications, 438 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 89%. The examiner's allowance rate across art units ranges from 77% to 94%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work in TC 2100 and reflects historical disposition data. The record encompasses 540 total applications, of which 56 were abandoned.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting an overall allowance rate that reflects the examiner's combined history. The allowance rate is computed from decided (disposed) applications and does not include pending cases. Figures in a pooled profile describe past record only and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit performance may vary from the aggregate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
386 APPS · 94% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

94% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION320 / 20 / 46allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.4 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY27.3 moart unit avg 41 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility10% · art unit 21%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)88%
§103 — Obviousness87% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness27%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW94%0 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 140 decided applications with an interview and 200 without.

ART UNIT 2131
154 APPS · 77% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

77% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 56%
DISPOSITION118 / 36 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16 moart unit avg 26.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.7 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility22% · art unit 29%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)88%
§103 — Obviousness89% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness63%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW87%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW70%+17 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 60 decided applications with an interview and 94 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Masud K Khan

  • What is Examiner Khan's overall allowance rate?
    The overall allowance rate is 89%, based on 438 allowed applications among 494 disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This record spans 2 art units (2131 and 2132) in Technology Center 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across art units?
    Allowance rates range from 77% to 94% across the examiner's art units in TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record mean for my application?
    The pooled record describes historical disposition data and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit performance may differ from the aggregate figure.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Masud K Khan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 540 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP