Examiner Matiyas T Maru has allowed 31 of 48 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Matiyas T Maru maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 92 total applications, 48 have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Of those 48 decided applications, 31 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record across all assignments and is not a prediction of outcome for any specific application.
This record aggregates all of the examiner's work across their assigned art units. The allowance rate reflects past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications divided by total decided applications—and describes only what has occurred, not what will occur in any pending case. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; that detail appears separately on this profile. Aggregate statistics are correlational, not predictive.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 28 decided applications with an interview and 20 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matiyas T Maru has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 92 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP