LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MATTHEW G MCVICKER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Matthew G Mcvicker

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 56 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION NOV 2018
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Matthew G Mcvicker has allowed 23 of 56 decided applications (41%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

41% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Matthew G Mcvicker maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 56 applications, of which 23 were allowed and 33 were abandoned. The allowance rate across these disposed applications is 41%. This figure represents the proportion of decided cases resulting in allowance and does not include pending applications. The pooled record spans a single art unit and reflects historical disposition data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's activity across all art units in which they work. The allowance rate and application counts presented here are historical summaries—they describe what has been decided in the past. Pooled figures do not isolate performance by individual art unit or technology area. An aggregate allowance rate is a description of past outcomes, not a prediction of the outcome of any particular application or a measure of examination standards.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
56 APPS · 41% ALLOWANCE
41% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION23 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.2 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.7 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility30% · art unit 45%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)87%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 92%
§112 — Written description & definiteness74%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW55%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW24%+31 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 25 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Matthew G Mcvicker

  • What is Matthew G Mcvicker's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 41% across 56 disposed applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The record spans one art unit (2144) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these figures mean for my application?
    These figures describe the examiner's historical record. An allowance rate is a historical statistic and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application.
  • Why are abandoned applications included in the allowance rate?
    Allowance rate is computed as allowed applications divided by all disposed (decided) applications—both allowed and abandoned. Pending applications are excluded. This standard metric reflects the proportion of decided cases that resulted in allowance.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matthew G Mcvicker has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 56 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP