Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa has allowed 168 of 186 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Matthew N Putaraksa maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 186 decided applications, he issued 168 allowances and 18 abandonments, corresponding to a 90% allowance rate. His record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects the outcomes of applications disposed over the period covered by the public record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application or filing.
This profile aggregates Putaraksa's record across one art unit within TC 2100. The 90% allowance rate is computed from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in that pooled set. Pooled rates describe historical outcomes and are not predictions about any individual application. Rates across different art units may vary; per-art-unit breakdowns appear in a separate section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 91 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 186 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP