LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MATTHEW N PUTARAKSA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 186 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2025
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa has allowed 168 of 186 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

90% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Matthew N Putaraksa maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 186 decided applications, he issued 168 allowances and 18 abandonments, corresponding to a 90% allowance rate. His record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects the outcomes of applications disposed over the period covered by the public record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application or filing.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Putaraksa's record across one art unit within TC 2100. The 90% allowance rate is computed from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in that pooled set. Pooled rates describe historical outcomes and are not predictions about any individual application. Rates across different art units may vary; per-art-unit breakdowns appear in a separate section of this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2114
186 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 84%
DISPOSITION168 / 18 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.7 moart unit avg 23.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.1 moart unit avg 35.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility46% · art unit 34%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)83%
§103 — Obviousness78% · art unit 74%
§112 — Written description & definiteness72%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW96%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW85%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 91 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa

  • What is Matthew N Putaraksa's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 90%, calculated from 186 decided applications (168 allowed, 18 abandoned). This figure describes his past record and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Putaraksa's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100. This pooled profile aggregates his outcomes across that unit.
  • What is the subject matter of this examiner's art unit?
    Putaraksa examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • Does the allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. The 90% rate describes historical dispositions and is not a prediction of the outcome for any specific application. Individual results depend on application-specific facts, claims, and examination.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matthew N Putaraksa has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 186 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP