Examiner Matthew R Chrzanowski has allowed 106 of 174 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Matthew R Chrzanowski has a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 174 decided applications, his allowance rate is 61%, with 106 allowed and 68 abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 57% to 74% across his art units. This pooled figure aggregates work spanning both art units and reflects the examiner's historical record of decisions on applications that have reached final disposition.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units into one overall figure. The 61% allowance rate describes past decisions across all art units combined and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. The range (57% to 74%) shows variation among the individual art units but does not indicate which applications fall into which rate. Pooled statistics are historical summaries, not forecasts.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 44 decided applications with an interview and 92 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Based on 38 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matthew R Chrzanowski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 174 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP