Examiner Matthew T Urick

What the data says.

Matthew T Urick maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 26 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 100%, with 26 allowed and zero abandoned applications. This record reflects outcomes on decided cases only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. The pooled figure aggregates all art units under his examination authority and describes his historical disposition record without predicting outcomes on any specific pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This record pools all art units under the examiner's authority. An aggregate allowance rate describes past dispositions across those units and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome. Different art units within TC 2100 may have different characteristics, backlogs, and application volumes. Pooled figures provide an overall historical snapshot and do not indicate how any specific application will be examined or decided.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

Questions about Examiner Matthew T Urick

• 01What is Matthew T Urick's overall allowance rate?

  His allowance rate is 100% across 26 disposed applications in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (2113) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures represent?

  These are historical dispositions (allowed and abandoned applications). They describe past outcomes and are not predictions of how any specific pending application will be examined or decided.
• 04Why are pending applications excluded from the allowance rate?

  Allowance rate measures only decided cases—those with a final disposition. Pending applications have no final decision and are therefore not included in the calculation.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.