Examiner Matthew W Wahlin has allowed 141 of 155 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Matthew W Wahlin's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 155 disposed applications, 141 were allowed and 14 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 91%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The record aggregates activity in a single art unit and represents the examiner's historical disposition data.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's activity across one art unit. The allowance rate and application counts reflect historical dispositions—applications decided through allowance or abandonment. Aggregate figures describe the past record only and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation within the pooled total.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 69 decided applications with an interview and 86 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Matthew W Wahlin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 155 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP