LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MD ABUL K AZAD
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Md Abul K Azad

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 704 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Md Abul K Azad has allowed 582 of 704 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

83% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2119 · 86%AU 2127 · 70%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Md Abul K Azad maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 704 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 582, for an 83% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 70% to 86% across the examiner's art units. This pooled record reflects decisions rendered over the examiner's career in TC 2100 and does not constitute a prediction of outcomes in any individual pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record is pooled across multiple art units in TC 2100, aggregating different subject areas and examination contexts. The 83% allowance rate describes past decisions on 704 closed applications and represents a historical average, not a forecast. Pooled figures smooth variation across art units; individual art-unit records appear separately and may differ materially from the aggregate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2119
581 APPS · 86% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines electric power networks, supply, and distribution.

86% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 83%
DISPOSITION469 / 74 / 38allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.2 moart unit avg 21.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.6 moart unit avg 31.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility43% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)90%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 74%
§112 — Written description & definiteness54%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW97%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+22 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 288 decided applications with an interview and 255 without.

ART UNIT 2127
161 APPS · 70% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

70% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION113 / 48 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.5 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.5 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility43% · art unit 51%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)59%
§103 — Obviousness86% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness64%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW82%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW63%+19 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 61 decided applications with an interview and 100 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Md Abul K Azad

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner allowed 582 of 704 disposed applications, for an 83% allowance rate.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner maintains a record in two art units within TC 2100.
  • How much does the allowance rate vary across art units?
    The allowance rate ranges from 70% to 86% across the examiner's art units.
  • Does this allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. This pooled rate describes historical decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Md Abul K Azad has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 742 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP