LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Md I Uddin

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 818 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Md I Uddin has allowed 668 of 818 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

82% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Md I Uddin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 818 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 82%. Of 864 total applications on record, 668 were allowed and 150 were abandoned. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical allowance rate across decided cases and does not forecast the outcome of any particular application. The record reflects past dispositions only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit assignments. The allowance rate of 82% describes the share of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and is computed from the disposed count alone, excluding pending cases. Aggregate figures characterize the examiner's historical record and are not predictions for any individual application. Each case is examined on its own merits under patent law.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2169
864 APPS · 82% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

82% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION668 / 150 / 46allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.6 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY38 moart unit avg 40 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility61% · art unit 57%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)85%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness24%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW93%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW33%+60 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 662 decided applications with an interview and 156 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Md I Uddin

  • What is Examiner Md I Uddin's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 82%, calculated from 818 disposed applications (668 allowed, 150 abandoned). This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's record spans one art unit (2169) within TC 2100. The pooled figures above aggregate all applications within that assignment.
  • What does the allowance rate include or exclude?
    The allowance rate includes only disposed (decided) applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from this calculation. The rate does not reflect all 864 total applications on record.
  • What is the subject matter of this examiner's record?
    All figures are drawn from TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security. Subject-matter scope is defined by the technology center, not by individual application details.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Md I Uddin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 864 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP