Examiner Md N Mia has allowed 22 of 60 decided applications (37%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Md N Mia maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Over 60 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 22 and abandoned 38, yielding an allowance rate of 37%. This rate reflects outcomes among applications decided by final action or abandonment, excluding pending matters. The examiner's allowance rate ranges from 27% to 44% across the art units on record, indicating variation in outcomes within this technology center.
This pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 37% overall allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask differences between individual art units—some may show higher or lower rates. Aggregate statistics describe historical data only and do not indicate how any examiner will act on a particular filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 34 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 26 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Md N Mia has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 60 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP