Examiner Mehdi Namazi has allowed 622 of 700 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mehdi Namazi maintains a public record across 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 700 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 89%, meaning 622 applications were allowed and 78 were abandoned. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 86% to 90%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions; it is not a prediction for any specific application.
This record pools applications across multiple art units within TC 2100. The aggregate allowance rate (89% of 700 decided applications) describes past dispositions and reflects the examiner's overall pattern across different subject areas. The range (86%–90%) shows variation among individual art units. Pooled figures do not predict outcomes in any particular case and are historical context only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 170 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 90 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 137 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 110 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mehdi Namazi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 700 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP