Examiner Mehran Kamran has allowed 543 of 593 decided applications (92%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mehran Kamran maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans 1 art unit and covers 629 total applications. Of 593 disposed applications, 543 were allowed and 50 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 92%. This rate is calculated on the decided application count (disposed applications) and does not include pending cases. The record reflects outcomes across all art units in which he has examined.
This pooled record aggregates all art units where the examiner has worked. The allowance rate and disposal counts describe the past record and are historical figures only. They are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics across multiple art units mask variation within individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail for comparison.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 312 decided applications with an interview and 281 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mehran Kamran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 629 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP