LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MELTIN BELL
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Meltin Bell

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 24 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2005
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Meltin Bell has allowed 8 of 24 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

33% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2129 · 8%AU 2121 · 64%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Meltin Bell maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 24 disposed applications, 8 were allowed and 16 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 33%. This figure represents the proportion of decided cases in the examiner's pooled record. The data reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; applications pending before the examiner are not included in this calculation.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates applications across multiple art units, combining different subject areas and examination histories into a single overall rate. The 33% allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures mask variation across individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail for TC 2100.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2129
13 APPS · 8% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

8% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION1 / 12 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION32.4 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49 moart unit avg 42.3 mo
ART UNIT 2121
11 APPS · 64% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

64% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION7 / 4 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION32.1 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Meltin Bell

  • What is Meltin Bell's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 33%, based on 8 allowed and 16 abandoned applications among 24 disposed cases in the examiner's pooled record across TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Meltin Bell's record spans 2 art units (2121 and 2129) within Technology Center 2100. This page presents pooled figures across both units; per-unit data appears separately.
  • Does the allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. The pooled rate describes past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction for any specific case. Individual results vary by application, examiner, and art unit.
  • What does 'disposed' mean?
    Disposed applications are those that have reached final decision—either allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Meltin Bell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP