Examiner Meltin Bell has allowed 8 of 24 decided applications (33%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Meltin Bell maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 24 disposed applications, 8 were allowed and 16 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 33%. This figure represents the proportion of decided cases in the examiner's pooled record. The data reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; applications pending before the examiner are not included in this calculation.
This pooled record aggregates applications across multiple art units, combining different subject areas and examination histories into a single overall rate. The 33% allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures mask variation across individual art units; a separate section of this page provides per-art-unit detail for TC 2100.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Meltin Bell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP