Examiner Meng Yao Zhe

What the data says.

Examiner Meng Yao Zhe maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 308 disposed applications, 213 were allowed and 95 were abandoned, yielding a 69% allowance rate. This rate reflects the examiner's pooled record across a single art unit (2195). The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only and does not include pending cases. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity across all assigned art units within TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates application dispositions and allowance rates across multiple art units. The 69% allowance rate describes past outcomes over 308 decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; detailed performance within each art unit appears separately. Allowance rates are correlational historical data, not causal indicators of how any future examination will proceed.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines program control and execution.

Questions about Examiner Meng Yao Zhe

• 01What is Examiner Meng Yao Zhe's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's pooled allowance rate is 69%, based on 213 allowed applications out of 308 disposed applications across all assigned art units in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This examiner's public record spans one art unit (2195) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled allowance rate mean?

  The pooled rate aggregates allowances and abandonments across all art units and is a historical summary. It is not a forecast for any individual application and does not account for differences in prosecution complexity or claim scope among cases.
• 04Does this rate apply to my specific application?

  No. Pooled allowance rates describe past aggregate outcomes. Individual application outcomes depend on claim content, prior art, examination, and response strategy, and cannot be predicted from historical rates.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.