Examiner Michael J Hicks has allowed 259 of 424 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michael J Hicks holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 424 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 259 and saw 165 abandoned, producing an allowance rate of 61%. This record spans a single art unit (2165). The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not include pending matters. These figures represent the examiner's pooled historical output and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates data across one art unit within TC 2100. The 61% allowance rate describes the examiner's past performance on decided cases and reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all applications with a final disposition. Aggregate statistics describe historical output only and are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application or the examiner's examination of future matters.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 146 decided applications with an interview and 278 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael J Hicks has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 424 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP