LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MICHAEL J HUNTLEY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Michael J Huntley

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 233 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Michael J Huntley has allowed 162 of 233 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

70% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2116 · 78%AU 2121 · 62%AU 2129 · 65%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Michael J Huntley has a public record of 237 total applications across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 233 disposed applications, 162 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 70%. The 71 abandoned applications represent the remainder of the decided record. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 62% to 78%, reflecting variation in outcomes within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates performance across these three art units and describes the historical record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single allowance rate. The 70% figure represents all decisions (allowed and abandoned applications) across these three units and reflects the historical aggregate record. Pooled figures describe what occurred in the past and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual application. Variation across art units—shown by the 62% to 78% range—is normal and reflects differences in the art units themselves, not a measure of consistency or change over time.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2116
105 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION82 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20 moart unit avg 24.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.7 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility51% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)93%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness68%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW81%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW70%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 78 decided applications with an interview and 27 without.

ART UNIT 2121
102 APPS · 62% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

62% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION63 / 39 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.8 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY42.1 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility39% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)91%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness58%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW75%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW43%+32 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 60 decided applications with an interview and 42 without.

ART UNIT 2129
30 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION17 / 9 / 4allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.1 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY52.2 moart unit avg 42.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility44% · art unit 63%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)85%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 75%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%

Based on 30 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Michael J Huntley

  • What is Michael J Huntley's overall allowance rate?
    70%, based on 162 allowed applications out of 233 disposed applications in the pooled record across all three art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Michael J Huntley has a record spanning 3 art units (2116, 2121, 2129) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across art units?
    Yes. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 62% to 78%. This pooled record aggregates those separate results into a single 70% figure.
  • What does this pooled record predict about my application?
    The pooled record describes historical outcomes only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael J Huntley has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 237 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP