LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MICHAEL J YIGDALL
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Michael J Yigdall

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 241 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2011
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Michael J Yigdall has allowed 126 of 241 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

52% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2192 · 54%AU 2122 · 10%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Michael J Yigdall's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 241 disposed applications, Yigdall issued 126 allowances and 115 abandonments, resulting in a 52% allowance rate. This rate is based on the total of allowed and abandoned applications—the decided count—and does not include pending filings. The record reflects outcomes across multiple art units pooled together and represents historical disposal data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rate is computed from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units; per-unit detail appears in a separate section. Historical aggregate rates provide context on an examiner's overall record but do not determine future application results.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2192
231 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering.

54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION125 / 106 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.6 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY62.1 moart unit avg 45.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility67% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)33%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW81%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW41%+40 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 156 without.

ART UNIT 2122
10 APPS · 10% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

10% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION1 / 9 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION34.1 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.6 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Michael J Yigdall

  • What is Michael J Yigdall's overall allowance rate?
    52% across 241 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    2 art units (2122 and 2192). The allowance rate shown is pooled across both.
  • What does the 52% allowance rate mean?
    Of 241 decided applications, 126 were allowed and 115 were abandoned. The rate reflects historical outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • Does this rate apply to my application?
    No. Pooled historical rates describe past dispositions. They are not predictions of any individual application's outcome and do not account for application-specific facts.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael J Yigdall has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 241 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP