Examiner Michael K Botts has allowed 10 of 21 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michael K Botts maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 21 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 48%, with 10 allowed and 11 abandoned. The examiner works within a single art unit (2176). This pooled record reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The allowance rate represents the proportion of applications that received final approval among all applications decided.
This record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s) and presents the pooled allowance rate as a historical summary. The 48% figure describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe population-level patterns and do not determine individual application results. Each application is evaluated independently based on its individual merits and the evidence of record.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael K Botts has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 21 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP