Examiner Michael L Westbrook has allowed 175 of 232 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michael L Westbrook holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across his single art unit, he has disposed of 232 applications. Of those decided cases, 175 were allowed and 57 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. His overall record spans 257 total applications. This pooled figure describes his historical record across all art units under his purview and does not forecast the outcome of any individual pending matter.
This profile aggregates Westbrook's record across all assigned art units in TC 2100 into one pooled measure. The 75% allowance rate reflects decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and excludes pending filings. Pooled figures describe past dispositions across multiple art units and are not predictions about specific applications. Individual art-unit records, where available, may show variation from the aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 99 decided applications with an interview and 133 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael L Westbrook has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 257 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP