Examiner Michael W Ayers has allowed 230 of 319 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michael W Ayers holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 367 total applications, 230 were allowed and 89 abandoned, yielding 319 disposed applications. The allowance rate over these decided applications is 72%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of outcomes in TC 2100. These figures describe the past disposition record and do not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
A pooled record aggregates all decisions across an examiner's assigned art units into a single allowance-rate figure. That rate—here 72%—reflects the historical share of allowed applications among all decided cases. The figure describes what occurred in the past and is correlational only. Aggregate statistics do not predict outcomes in individual applications, which depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 232 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael W Ayers has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 367 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP