LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MICHAEL W AYERS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Michael W Ayers

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 319 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Michael W Ayers has allowed 230 of 319 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

72% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Michael W Ayers holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 367 total applications, 230 were allowed and 89 abandoned, yielding 319 disposed applications. The allowance rate over these decided applications is 72%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of outcomes in TC 2100. These figures describe the past disposition record and do not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates all decisions across an examiner's assigned art units into a single allowance-rate figure. That rate—here 72%—reflects the historical share of allowed applications among all decided cases. The figure describes what occurred in the past and is correlational only. Aggregate statistics do not predict outcomes in individual applications, which depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2195
367 APPS · 72% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines program control and execution.

72% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION230 / 89 / 48allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.9 moart unit avg 33.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.7 moart unit avg 48.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility56% · art unit 49%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)45%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 93%
§112 — Written description & definiteness87%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW34%+52 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 232 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Michael W Ayers

  • What is Michael W Ayers's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 72%, calculated over 319 disposed applications (230 allowed, 89 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Michael W Ayers's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2195) in TC 2100. The pooled figures aggregate all decisions within that unit.
  • What does the 72% allowance rate mean?
    Of the 319 applications decided (allowed or abandoned), 72% were allowed. The rate describes past outcomes only and does not apply to or predict any individual pending application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael W Ayers has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 367 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP