LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MICHAEL W CHOI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Michael W Choi

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 423 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Michael W Choi has allowed 345 of 423 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

82% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2116 · 84%AU 2121 · 59%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Michael W Choi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across two art units. Over 423 disposed applications, his pooled allowance rate is 82%, with 345 allowed and 78 abandoned. The record spans art units 2116 and 2121. Allowance rates across these art units range from 59% to 84%. This aggregate figure reflects decided applications only and does not account for pending matters.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates statistics from multiple art units into a single profile. The allowance rate shown—82% over 423 disposed applications—is a historical summary across TC 2100 and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. The range of 59% to 84% reflects variation among the examiner's individual art units but does not identify which rate applies to any particular application or subject matter.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2116
443 APPS · 84% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

84% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION325 / 64 / 54allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.1 moart unit avg 24.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY33.7 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility48% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)70%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW71%+23 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 207 decided applications with an interview and 182 without.

ART UNIT 2121
34 APPS · 59% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

59% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION20 / 14 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.2 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.2 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility55% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)61%
§103 — Obviousness94% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness74%

Based on 34 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Michael W Choi

  • What is Michael W Choi's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 82%, based on 345 allowed applications and 78 abandoned applications among 423 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record covers two art units (2116 and 2121) in TC 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across his art units?
    Allowance rates range from 59% to 84% across the examiner's art units with a substantial record.
  • Does this pooled rate apply to my application?
    No. This aggregate figure describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael W Choi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 477 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP