Examiner Michael Young Won has allowed 116 of 150 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michael Young Won maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), with a singular art unit. Across 150 disposed applications, 116 were allowed and 34 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 77%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The figures represent past outcomes and do not constitute a prediction for any specific application or case.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's decisions across all assigned art units into a single allowance rate. The 77% figure describes historical dispositions—applications already decided—and reflects no prediction about future outcomes or any particular pending case. Pooled rates combine different subject areas and examination contexts; they describe the examiner's overall record, not the likelihood of allowance in any individual matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 91 decided applications with an interview and 59 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michael Young Won has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 150 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP