Examiner Michele C Choi has allowed 52 of 145 decided applications (36%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Michele C Choi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Over 145 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 52 and abandoned 93, yielding an allowance rate of 36%. This rate is computed from decided applications only and does not include any pending matters. The record reflects decisions across art units 2164 and 2169 in pooled form.
This profile aggregates Michele C Choi's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 36% describes outcomes on 145 decided applications and is a historical measure of the examiner's past disposal pattern. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes on any individual application. Individual art-unit records are reported separately and may differ from the pooled figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 58 decided applications with an interview and 70 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Michele C Choi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 145 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP