Examiner Midys Rojas has allowed 927 of 1,060 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Midys Rojas maintains a public record across 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,060 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 87%. This aggregate figure reflects 927 allowed applications and 133 abandoned applications pooled across the art units served. The allowance rate ranges from 65% to 95% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record by specific art unit.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units and represents past dispositions, not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application. The overall allowance rate describes historical patterns across all art units combined. Art-unit-level detail is available separately and may differ materially from the aggregate. Pooled statistics describe what occurred; they are not forecasts of future prosecution results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 151 decided applications with an interview and 477 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 58 decided applications with an interview and 176 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 154 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Midys Rojas has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,096 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP