Examiner Minh Chau Nguyen has allowed 44 of 66 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Minh Chau Nguyen's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 66 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 44 and abandoned 22, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. This figure represents the percentage of decided applications in the pooled record. The data covers applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate of 67% describes the examiner's historical record across decided applications and is not a prediction of outcome for any specific application. Applicants review pooled figures to understand an examiner's past patterns; such statistics are correlational summaries of completed cases, not indicators of how any individual application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Minh Chau Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 66 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP