Examiner Minh Dieu T Nguyen has allowed 102 of 133 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Minh Dieu T Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 133 disposed applications, 102 were allowed and 31 abandoned, for an allowance rate of 77%. This rate is calculated over decided applications only and does not include any pending filings. The examiner's record spans one art unit, pooling all activity within that unit into a single aggregate profile.
A pooled record aggregates all applications and dispositions across an examiner's assigned art units into one overall figure. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical decision pattern—the percentage of decided cases resulting in allowance—and is derived from closed applications only. This aggregate figure is a description of past activity and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 86 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Minh Dieu T Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 133 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP