Examiner Minh Dinh

What the data says.

Minh Dinh's public record covers Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 101 disposed applications, 61 were allowed and 40 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 60%. This figure reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record aggregates activity within a single art unit in TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled examiner record aggregates decisions across all art units under that examiner's oversight. The allowance rate shown here—60% over 101 disposed applications—describes historical outcomes across that aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask potential variation among individual art units; per-art-unit data appears in a separate section of this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Minh Dinh

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  60% across 101 disposed applications in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  One art unit (2132) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these statistics tell me about my application?

  These figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined individually.
• 04Why is the total disposed applications different from what I expected?

  The allowance rate (60%) is calculated from disposed applications only—those decided as allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.