Examiner Mitra Kianersi has allowed 19 of 38 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Mitra Kianersi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 38 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 19 and abandoned 19, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. The examiner's pooled record spans a single art unit. This allowance rate reflects decisions on completed applications and is not a prediction of outcome for any individual case. The record represents historical dispositions only.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate describes past dispositions across all completed applications and does not function as a forecast for any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; per-art-unit breakdowns appear separately. Historical data describe what occurred, not what will occur in future prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mitra Kianersi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 38 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP