Examiner Mohamed A Wasel has allowed 24 of 46 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohamed A Wasel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner has disposed of 46 applications, of which 24 were allowed and 22 were abandoned. This corresponds to an allowance rate of 52% across the decided applications. The examiner's work spans one art unit, providing a pooled record across that single unit's applications.
This pooled record aggregates all applications handled by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 52% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record—the share of decided applications that were allowed—and reflects outcomes on those 46 disposed applications. Aggregate historical rates describe past outcomes and are not predictions about any specific pending application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohamed A Wasel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP