LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MOHAMED A WASEL
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Mohamed A Wasel

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 46 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Mohamed A Wasel has allowed 24 of 46 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

52% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Mohamed A Wasel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner has disposed of 46 applications, of which 24 were allowed and 22 were abandoned. This corresponds to an allowance rate of 52% across the decided applications. The examiner's work spans one art unit, providing a pooled record across that single unit's applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications handled by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 52% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record—the share of decided applications that were allowed—and reflects outcomes on those 46 disposed applications. Aggregate historical rates describe past outcomes and are not predictions about any specific pending application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2154
46 APPS · 52% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

52% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION24 / 22 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40 moart unit avg 27.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.1 moart unit avg 41.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Mohamed A Wasel

  • What is Mohamed A Wasel's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 52%, calculated from 24 allowed applications out of 46 disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2154) in Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the 52% allowance rate mean for my application?
    The 52% figure describes the examiner's historical record on decided applications. It is a description of past outcomes and is not a prediction of the outcome on any specific pending application.
  • How many total applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 46 applications in TC 2100, comprising 24 allowances and 22 abandonments.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohamed A Wasel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP