Examiner Mohamed Ibrahim

What the data says.

Mohamed Ibrahim's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 30 disposed applications, the examiner issued 12 allowances, yielding a 40% allowance rate. All 30 applications have reached a final disposition: 12 allowed and 18 abandoned. The record covers a single art unit. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across the examiner's assigned work in TC 2100 and reflects historical dispositions only, not a forecast of any future application's outcome.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates results from all art units assigned to an examiner. The figures shown—allowance rate and art-unit count—describe past dispositions only. The 40% rate is computed from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding any pending matters. This aggregate does not predict the outcome of any specific application, which depends on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history unique to each case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner Mohamed Ibrahim

• 01What is Mohamed Ibrahim's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 40%, based on 12 allowed applications out of 30 total disposed applications in the public record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Mohamed Ibrahim's record spans 1 art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03What does the 40% allowance rate mean for my application?

  The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its own merits.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 30 applications: 12 allowed and 18 abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.