Examiner Mohammad A Siddiqi has allowed 65 of 127 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad A Siddiqi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 127 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 65 and abandoned 62, yielding an allowance rate of 51%. This figure represents decisions on applications that have been resolved; pending applications are excluded from the calculation. The record reflects outcomes on a defined set of decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any future application.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here—51%—describes past dispositions across those units combined and reflects historical outcomes only. Because different art units cover different subject matter and application types, an aggregate rate does not predict results in any specific case or art unit. This figure is a snapshot of decided applications and carries no predictive force.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 30 decided applications with an interview and 97 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad A Siddiqi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 127 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP