Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana has allowed 744 of 845 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad Azam Sana maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 881 total applications, 744 were allowed and 101 abandoned, yielding 845 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 88% of those decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of activity in this technology center. This figure reflects historical outcomes on applications that reached final disposition and does not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.
This record is pooled across all art units in which the examiner works. A pooled allowance rate aggregates decisions from multiple art units and reflects past outcomes. The 88% figure describes what has occurred historically and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Different applications may receive different examination paths. The data presented is correlational, not causal, and does not indicate how any given prosecution will proceed.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 411 decided applications with an interview and 434 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 881 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP