LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MOHAMMAD AZAM SANA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 845 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana has allowed 744 of 845 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

88% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Mohammad Azam Sana maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 881 total applications, 744 were allowed and 101 abandoned, yielding 845 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 88% of those decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of activity in this technology center. This figure reflects historical outcomes on applications that reached final disposition and does not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record is pooled across all art units in which the examiner works. A pooled allowance rate aggregates decisions from multiple art units and reflects past outcomes. The 88% figure describes what has occurred historically and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Different applications may receive different examination paths. The data presented is correlational, not causal, and does not indicate how any given prosecution will proceed.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2166
881 APPS · 88% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

88% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION744 / 101 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.7 moart unit avg 23.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.2 moart unit avg 45 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility53% · art unit 44%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)54%
§103 — Obviousness83% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness34%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW97%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW79%+18 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 411 decided applications with an interview and 434 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana

  • What is Mohammad Azam Sana's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 88%, calculated from 744 allowed applications out of 845 disposed (decided) applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record is pooled across one art unit (2166) in TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of applications that were allowed, measured only among applications that received a final decision (allowed or abandoned). It does not include pending applications and is not a prediction for any individual case.
  • Why is the allowance rate paired with disposed applications?
    Allowance rate measures the share of decided cases only. Of 881 total applications, 845 reached a final decision. The 88% rate applies to those 845 decided applications, not to all filings.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad Azam Sana has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 881 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP