Examiner Mohammad H Kabir has allowed 303 of 441 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad H Kabir's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans 5 art units and covers 441 disposed applications. Of those decided applications, 303 were allowed and 138 were abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 69%. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 53% to 81%. This pooled figure reflects the aggregate record across all art units in which the examiner has maintained a substantial filing history.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units, masking variation between them. The overall allowance rate of 69% describes past decisions across all 5 art units combined and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may differ materially from the pooled average. The range (53%–81%) indicates that variation exists. Pooled statistics describe historical data only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 71 decided applications with an interview and 83 without.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 68 decided applications with an interview and 25 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 98 decided applications with an interview and 20 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 25 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 6 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad H Kabir has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 471 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP