Examiner Mohammad N Rahman has allowed 71 of 143 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad N Rahman maintains a public record of 143 disposed applications across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 71 were allowed and 72 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. The examiner's record spans two art units within TC 2100. Allowance rates across these art units range from 49% to 52%, reflecting modest variation in the pooled figures.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units in TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate—50% of 143 disposed applications—represents the historical proportion of allowed to abandoned applications across all assignments. Pooled figures describe past disposition patterns and are not predictions about any specific application or outcome. Individual art-unit records may show different rates and are detailed separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 27 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad N Rahman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 143 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP