Examiner Mohammad O Farooq has allowed 37 of 53 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad O Farooq maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 53 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 37 and abandoned 16. The pooled allowance rate is 70% of decided applications. This record aggregates work across art units 2181 and 2182. The figures reflect dispositions on applications that have reached final resolution; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's work across multiple art units, creating a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate rate describes the examiner's historical record and reflects dispositions on applications that have been decided. The pooled figure does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Applicants may also review per-art-unit breakdowns, where available, to see variation within the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad O Farooq has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP