Examiner Mohammad S Hasan has allowed 181 of 193 decided applications (94%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad S Hasan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 212 total applications, 181 were allowed and 12 were abandoned, for a combined disposed count of 193 decided applications. The allowance rate stands at 94% over those 193 disposed applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects the aggregate outcome across all applications in that art unit over the period covered.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate and disposal count shown here are historical summaries and do not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures reflect past dispositions and are useful for understanding an examiner's overall profile. Per-art-unit detail, where available separately, provides granular subject-matter context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 82 decided applications with an interview and 111 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad S Hasan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 212 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP