Examiner Mohammad Solaiman Bhuyan has allowed 171 of 201 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammad Solaiman Bhuyan maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Among 201 disposed applications, 171 were allowed, yielding an 85% allowance rate. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 82% to 86%. The examiner has worked 227 total applications, with 30 abandoned and no pending applications in the reported data. This pooled figure represents the aggregate record across both art units and does not reflect performance within any single unit.
A pooled record aggregates application outcomes across multiple art units into a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate describes the examiner's historical disposition and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates reflect past data and vary by art unit; the range reported here shows the spread of those unit-level rates. Pooled figures are useful for understanding an examiner's general record but do not account for differences in application complexity, examiner assignment, or other case-specific factors.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 78 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammad Solaiman Bhuyan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 227 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP