Examiner Mohammad W Reza

What the data says.

Mohammad W Reza holds a public record of 50 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Of those 50 decided applications, 25 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. This pooled figure represents applications examined across the examiner's assigned art unit(s) and reflects the ratio of allowances to all final dispositions—both grants and abandonments—in the public record.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data from all art units an examiner covers, presenting an overall allowance rate as a historical snapshot. The figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any future application. Aggregate rates mask variation by art unit and individual case characteristics. This data is correlational and does not predict outcomes in specific applications or establish causation from any examination practice.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

Questions about Examiner Mohammad W Reza

• 01What is Mohammad W Reza's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 50%, based on 25 allowed applications out of 50 total disposed applications in the public record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The record spans one art unit (2136) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures mean for my application?

  These figures describe the examiner's past record and are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined individually based on its unique claims, prior art, and arguments.
• 04Why is the record pooled across art units?

  The pooled record aggregates all disposed applications the examiner has handled. Because this examiner covers only one art unit, the pooled and art-unit-specific records are identical.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.