Examiner Mohammed H Rehman has allowed 678 of 829 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammed H Rehman has a public record of 859 total applications across 5 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 829 disposed applications, 678 were allowed, yielding an 82% allowance rate. The examiner's allowance rate across his art units ranges from 68% to 96%, reflecting variation in the record by individual art unit. This pooled figure represents past decisions and does not predict outcomes in any specific application.
This record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 82% pooled allowance rate is a historical summary of allowed versus abandoned applications; it describes the examiner's past decisions and is not a prediction applicable to any individual case. Applicants may review both the pooled rate and individual art-unit rates to understand the examiner's record across different subject areas within the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 90 decided applications with an interview and 229 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 115 decided applications with an interview and 132 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 62 without.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammed H Rehman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 859 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP