LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MOHAMMED H ZUBERI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Mohammed H Zuberi

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 547 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Mohammed H Zuberi has allowed 414 of 547 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

76% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2177 · 69%AU 2178 · 94%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Mohammed H Zuberi maintains a pooled allowance rate of 76% across 547 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His public record spans two art units. The allowance rate ranges from 69% to 94% across these art units, reflecting variation in the decided caseload by subject area within TC 2100. Of 579 total applications in his record, 414 were allowed and 133 were abandoned. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome across both art units and does not isolate performance by individual unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 76% describes historical outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Allowance rates vary by art unit; the range shown reflects that variation. Pooled statistics are useful for understanding an examiner's general record but do not account for differences in individual applications, amendments, or prosecution strategies.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2177
405 APPS · 69% ALLOWANCE
69% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION281 / 124 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.6 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY38.3 moart unit avg 40.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility31% · art unit 40%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)69%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 90%
§112 — Written description & definiteness39%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW52%+34 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 209 decided applications with an interview and 196 without.

ART UNIT 2178
174 APPS · 94% ALLOWANCE
94% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 54%
DISPOSITION133 / 9 / 32allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.3 moart unit avg 25.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29 moart unit avg 41.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility32% · art unit 36%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)74%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness38%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW96%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW92%+4 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 71 decided applications with an interview and 71 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Mohammed H Zuberi

  • What is Mohammed H Zuberi's overall allowance rate?
    76% across 547 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Two art units (2177 and 2178) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 69% to 94% across the examiner's art units, showing variation in decided outcomes by subject area.
  • Does this pooled rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammed H Zuberi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 579 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP