Examiner Mohammed Nurul Huda has allowed 265 of 351 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammed Nurul Huda maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 351 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 265, for an overall allowance rate of 75%. The allowance rate ranges from 41% to 80% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes within the technology center. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and does not characterize performance in any individual art unit.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units, masking differences in allowance rates between them. The overall figure—here 75%—describes historical outcomes across all applications the examiner has decided in TC 2100. This aggregate is a statistical snapshot of past dispositions and is not a prediction about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available, may show different rates.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 196 decided applications with an interview and 114 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Based on 39 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 2 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammed Nurul Huda has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 351 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP