Examiner Mohammed Shafayet has allowed 208 of 273 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mohammed Shafayet maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Over 273 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 76%. Of 324 total applications in the record, 208 were allowed and 65 abandoned. Allowance rates across his art units range from 64% to 78%. These figures represent his pooled historical record and reflect decisions made across the breadth of his assigned subject matter within TC 2100.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates performance across multiple art-unit assignments. The overall allowance rate (76% here) describes past outcomes across all those units combined, not any single unit in isolation. Aggregate historical figures describe what occurred; they are not predictions of outcomes in any specific pending application. Individual art-unit rates may vary and appear separately in detailed breakdowns.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 151 decided applications with an interview and 94 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 28 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohammed Shafayet has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 324 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP