LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/MOHSEN ALMANI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Mohsen Almani

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 413 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Mohsen Almani has allowed 223 of 413 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

54% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2159 · 54%AU 2155 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Mohsen Almani maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. His pooled allowance rate stands at 54% over 413 disposed applications. This figure represents allowed applications as a share of all decided cases (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending matters. The examiner's record reflects work across a multi-unit portfolio within the technology center. The data reflects the examiner's historical examination activity and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates examination statistics across multiple art units, creating an overall profile rather than unit-specific detail. The allowance rate describes past disposed applications and is calculated from decided cases only—pending applications are excluded from this percentage. Aggregate figures characterize the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about individual applications. Separate art-unit breakdowns, where available, offer more granular context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2159
442 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION223 / 187 / 32allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.3 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.4 moart unit avg 45.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility53% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)86%
§103 — Obviousness88% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness48%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW61%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW46%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 231 decided applications with an interview and 179 without.

ART UNIT 2155
3 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION0 / 3 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.9 moart unit avg 27.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.3 moart unit avg 42.2 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility100% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)50%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness0%

Based on 3 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Mohsen Almani

  • What is Examiner Almani's overall allowance rate?
    The pooled allowance rate is 54%, calculated over 413 disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned). This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Examiner Almani's public record spans 2 art units (2155, 2159) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does 'allowance rate' mean?
    Allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (allowed divided by allowed plus abandoned). Pending applications are not included. It describes the examiner's past record, not any individual case.
  • Does this pooled rate apply to my application?
    The pooled allowance rate is an aggregate historical statistic and is not a prediction of any specific application. Art-unit-specific records, where available separately, may offer additional context.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mohsen Almani has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 445 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP