Examiner Molly Clarke Sippel

What the data says.

Examiner Molly Clarke Sippel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 50 total applications, 17 have been disposed (decided). Of those 17 disposed applications, 9 were allowed and 8 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 53% over the decided count. The examiner works within a single art unit (2122), meaning this pooled record reflects activity in one defined subject area within TC 2100. This allowance rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of outcomes in any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decisions within a single art unit and describes the examiner's historical allowance rate relative to disposed applications only—pending cases are excluded from the calculation. The 53% figure is a snapshot of past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any specific pending application. Individual case merit, claim scope, prior art, and arguments presented determine each application's path independently.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Molly Clarke Sippel

• 01What is Examiner Sippel's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 53%, based on 9 allowed applications and 8 abandoned applications among 17 total disposed applications in the examiner's public record.
• 02How many art units does Examiner Sippel work in?

  The examiner's record spans one art unit: 2122 within TC 2100.
• 03What subject matter does this examiner cover?

  Examiner Sippel works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 04Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?

  No. The allowance rate describes past decisions over 17 disposed applications and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.