Examiner Monica M Pyo has allowed 575 of 693 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Monica M Pyo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 722 total applications, 575 have been allowed and 118 abandoned, yielding 693 disposed applications. The examiner's allowance rate stands at 83% of decided applications. The record spans a single art unit, pooling outcomes across that unit's filings. These figures represent the examiner's historical disposition record and describe past outcomes only.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided within the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate and application counts reflect cumulative historical data. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any individual case. Each application is unique; past statistics do not predict the outcome of a specific filing or govern how any future application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 461 decided applications with an interview and 232 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Monica M Pyo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 722 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP