Examiner Monplaisir G Hamilton

What the data says.

Examiner Monplaisir G Hamilton maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across 2 art units. Over 34 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 32%. This means 11 applications were allowed and 23 were abandoned among the decided cases. The pooled record spans art units 2135 and 2172. This aggregate figure reflects outcomes across both art units combined and describes the examiner's historical disposition of applications in this technology center.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units, creating a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past outcomes but is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The examiner's work spans different subject areas within TC 2100, and the combined rate reflects all decided cases across those areas. Individual art-unit records, where available, provide more specialized subject-matter context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Monplaisir G Hamilton

• 01What is Examiner Hamilton's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 32% over 34 disposed applications (11 allowed, 23 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans 2 art units: 2135 and 2172, both within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled record mean?

  The pooled record combines outcomes across all art units into one allowance-rate figure. It describes aggregate past outcomes, not any individual case, and is not a prediction.
• 04Why is the allowance rate lower than the art-unit range shown?

  The overall pooled rate (32%) falls below the art-unit range (37% minimum and maximum). Aggregate figures can differ from individual art-unit rates depending on application volume and dispositions in each unit.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.