Examiner Moriam Mosunmola Godo has allowed 32 of 70 decided applications (46%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Moriam Mosunmola Godo maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 131 total applications, 70 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 70 decided applications, 32 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 46%. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 42% to 49%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and reflects historical outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.
This record pools results across multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating allowance rates that may vary by art unit. The overall 46% allowance rate describes past dispositions only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth out individual art-unit variation; applicants reviewing this examiner may also consult art-unit-specific data to see the range of historical rates.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 37 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Moriam Mosunmola Godo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 131 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP