Examiner Moustafa M Meky has allowed 236 of 277 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Moustafa M Meky has a public record spanning two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 277 disposed applications, 236 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 85%. This rate is calculated from decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending cases. The examiner's pooled record aggregates outcomes across both art units, providing an overall view of disposition patterns in this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units into a single set of statistics. The allowance rate and application counts presented here reflect the examiner's combined output across all assigned art units. These figures describe the historical record only and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation within the overall aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 241 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Moustafa M Meky has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 277 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP